May » 2011 » One Voice for Working Forests

Archive for May, 2011

Soaring through the air on biomass

May 25th, 2011

The state of Massachusetts, in essentially ending any biomass industry in the state, has the unfortunate distinction of being the only government to ban a valuable source of renewable energy just when our country needs it the most. And to make things worse, the state’s decision was based on phony information.

Bob Cleaves, the head of the Biomass Power Association, said this week that the decision by Massachusetts sends a troubling message to developers and investors.

Never mind the fact that by displacing biomass, Massachusetts has inadvertently become the largest supporter of baseload coal and natural gas, or that the state’s own study had nothing to do with using forestry residues and byproducts. Investors and developers in all renewable energy sources should be concerned about the underlying message this sends: Come to Massachusetts and invest in our renewable markets, but we can and will change the rules of the game, and we don’t care if you lose your investment based on later policies we enact. We can and will change the rules, regardless of your reasonable expectations based on our representations.

Fortunately, the biomass industry grows by leaps and bounds elsewhere as Massachusetts continues to marginalize itself. According to Biomass Magazine, Japan is likely to turn to biomass as it moves further away from nuclear energy after the tsunami in March.

In Washington state, a coalition of aviation companies and other stakeholders — called Sustainable Aviation Fuels Northwest — is moving forward on a plan to wean the aviation industry off the oil companies and make fuel from regional feedstock instead, including woody biomass.

The coalition today just released a study that shows Washington, with its aerospace industry and natural resources, could become a leader in biofuels for aviation.

According to the 10-month study, the state’s combination of forests and irrigated farmland makes Washington state a good place to develop biofuels based on a variety of sources, including wood waste, oil seeds, solid waste and algae.

“It’s very clear the Northwest has an opportunity to capitalize on this new direction and get in front. We really have everything we need in the world, we are among the leaders in the world,” said Billy Glover, vice president of environmental strategy for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes division of Chicago-based Boeing Co.

In an op-ed in the Tacoma News Tribune, Ross Macfarlane, a member of the coalition, said Washington has a unique opportunity.

The Northwest can play a significant role in accelerating a key part of the next Industrial Revolution – creating sustainable fuels for the next generation of flight. In doing so, we will address the most critical economic, energy security and environmental challenges facing our region and nation.

The Washington Department of Natural Resources, which is also supporting aviation biofuel, just cited a new Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) study that shows using woody biomass as an energy source without changing land use can reduce emissions.

As part of DNR’s Forest Biomass Initiative, aviation biofuel would be the highest and best use for residual forest biomass, as well as a unique opportunity to help efficient technologies get to the marketplace.

Forest biomass is envisioned as a sustainable energy source that can play a meaningful role in Washington’s renewable energy sector. Using forest biomass, such as logging slash or forest health treatment thinnings, doesn’t require changing the current uses of the state’s working forests. It also would help maintain working forests as lands providing jobs, habitat, clean water and other benefits to the public.

Working together for a shared future

May 20th, 2011

Coos County on the Oregon Coast has a long history in the timber business. Back in the early 1900s, it was particularly dangerous and hard to live as a lumberman, as this recent story from the Coos Bay World points out. Nowadays the toughest challenge for Coos County is how to keep its economy going while the timber industry changes. The news this week that a nearby lumber mill would lay off 50 people caused the World’s editorial board to take a look at what the county needs to do the maintain its economic future.

The paper’s answer? Diversify.

The wood-products industry is not what it once was, and it never will be again. Unstopping the bottleneck of federal timber harvests would help, but a recessionary economy makes demand, not supply, the bigger problem. We need additional avenues of prosperity…

So we need a diverse portfolio: A robust timber industry. An inviting waterfront. A rebuilt railroad. Organic dairies. Steel fabrication. Fishing charters. Chromite mining. Dune riding. A reactivated international port. Renewable energy.

All of those sectors can coexist. We just need to stop arguing about which one is best.

In other news, the Medford Mail Tribune took a look at a 58-million-board-foot timber sale in Southern Oregon that has the support of both environmentalists and forestry companies. The trick was bringing all sides together from the beginning.

“It does feel weird saying this,” added (George Sexton), the conservation director for the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, an Ashland-based environmental watchdog group. “If someone had told me 10 years ago that I would be applauding a 58-million-board-foot timber sale, I certainly wouldn’t have believed it.”

But the the ranger for the High Cascades Ranger District Rogue in the River-Siskiyou National Forest helped work out any differences between the two sides.

“My hat is off to him,” Sexton said. “There were a lot of issues and comments to deal with in this planning process. He melded the concerns together to protect the old trees, watersheds and wildlands while producing a vast amount of timber from small-diameter thinning.

“He was able to hit that sweet spot,” he added.

Biomass succeeds in D.C. and Northwest

May 13th, 2011

The announcement in January that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was putting off a decision on biomass plant emissions for three years was great news for the biomass industry, but the debate will surely rage on.

The EPA says it will finalize the three-year deferral on July 1 and it’s taking public comments on the decision in the meantime. The EPA has shown that it plans to move forward with the three-year deferral and has even started taking nominations for a scientific panel that will study biomass emissions over the three-year period. Though that hasn’t stopped the Natural Resources Defense Council from launching a misinformation campaign aimed at the EPA.

The NRDC says that the EPA’s three-year deferral “will create a powerful incentive for power plants to shift from burning coal to burning biomass” and tries to make that sound like a bad thing. Our country needs clean sources of renewable energy, and it’s unfortunate that environmental groups like the NRDC are trying to stand in the way of a cause one would think they would want to lead.

David Tenny, the President of the National Alliance of Forest Owners, recently told the EPA that the three-year deferral will allow the federal agency to make a fair decision, unlike the state of Massachusetts, which effectively ended its biomass industry because of a deeply flawed study. The study, by the Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, has been widely discredited.

Tenny to the EPA:

“The flawed study resulted in a flawed policy. EPA can learn from the unfortunate outcome in Massachusetts to put in place an even-handed review.”

Allowing the EPA to study the issue for three years holds some promise, Tenny said.

Tenny reminded the EPA that NAFO, “stands ready to work with the Agency to establish a policy recognizing the full carbon and landscape benefits of forest biomass as an energy source.”

In the Pacific Northwest, biomass will also be a major factor as the timber industry looks to new technologies and state governments rely more on renewable energy sources. The Longview Daily News recently took a look at the promise of biomass projects in Washington, especially as Initiative 937 mandates the state adopt more renewable energy.

In Washington, biomass can also help boost the bottom line of existing (pulp and lumber mill) facilities.

“It’s the idea of one more tool in the tool kit in their business portfolio,” said state Sen. Brian Hatfield, D-Raymond, whose 18th legislative district is heavily dependent on pulp and lumber mills for jobs.

The Register-Guard in Eugene, Ore., did an in-depth story this month on the new Seneca Sustainable Energy biomass plant that is “the cleanest in Oregon and possibly in the nation,” according to Merlyn Hough, director of the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency, which issued Seneca its permits to operate.

While environmental groups complained before the plant’s opening that it would emit toxic emissions, the plant’s innovative exhaust system means it’s been operating without any visible sign.

On Wednesday there were no visible emissions coming out of the exhaust tower.

“A lot of people ask when we’re going to start running,” said Seneca timberlands manager Todd Payne, who is overseeing the power plant. “We tell them we’ve been running.”

The plant also is a critical source of power for the Eugene area. The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) has a 15-year contract with the plant because it’s reliable and locally sourced, unlike hydroelectric power.

The local electricity also insulates EWEB from natural disasters that could disrupt the power supply in the Columbia basin. “Seneca, being local and firm can be a source to help keep vital services going,” Harwood said.

Cutting for China

May 6th, 2011

The Coos Bay World just published a great look at what the increased demand from China for timber means in a local timber community. Loggers in the Oregon coastal town are coming out of retirement and scores of longshoremen are arriving to help load the ships.

Coos County has a pretty good customer in China at the moment. The country’s seemingly insatiable appetite for timber is stirring a bit of a frenzy here as log trucks roar down roads and ships cruise overseas with Oregon Coast payloads.

“We gathered our stuff up and got out of hibernation,” says Dennis Cole, of Coos Bay’s Cole & Hongell Logging.

“There’s a lot of people who haven’t worked in two years,” Mahaffy adds.

China’s growing demand for timber has become a major  — and welcome — trend for the Pacific Northwest timber industry. Dan Fulton, the chief executive of Weyerhaeuser, told the Wall Street Journal in February: “Everybody in the Northwest is talking about China.”

While demand and prices are going up across the U.S., “the benefits are greatest for U.S. timber companies with operations in the Pacific Northwest, where the access to China is easiest,” according to the Journal.

The West, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California, accounted for 44% of all U.S. timber production in 2009, compared with 50% for the South, according to estimates by the Western Wood Products Association and the Southern Forest Products Association.

There are major caveats though. The logging activity may not be long-term. Dave Lewis, the head of the Truck Loggers Association in British Columbia, noted this week that there are limits to the recent success.

A lot has been written about China’s hunger for raw materials and building products. While China’s appetite seems insatiable, the reality is that without a thriving United States housing market, there is more global lumber supply than demand.

In Coos Bay, the solution to the uncertainty is to act fast.

Bob Mahaffy surveys his 300-acre property, dense with Douglas and grand fir, as a saw’s buzz peals through the forest. He plans to clear about 2 million board feet – about 400 truckloads of felled timber – within two to three months to cash in on a hot log-export market.

He’s got to get while the getting’s good.

“I don’t expect it to last as long as most people do,” the Coos Bay resident says of China’s top-dollar offerings for U.S. logs.

There are no doubt benefits to the recent trend, no matter what happens in the next five to 10 years.

While exports to China aren’t a long-term solution for the U.S. timber industry—the trend hasn’t spurred many mills to hire new workers or expand capacity—they are a bright spot that is helping to stave off further declines and cuts.

“It’s a step in the right direction,” said Steve Chercover, an analyst at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Portland, Ore.